There are few things more fun and more entertaining on a plane, than reading SkyMall. Sure, it’s interesting to see what...
Do All Your Actions Support...
The Road to Great Content
Nope, Content Is Still King:...
In this video interview link building expert Jim Boykin explains[…]
Join Nick Mihailovski and Ikai Lan from the Analytics and[…]
Could you please give details on what should be included[…]
| We’ll Stop Screaming “Relevance” When You Start Listening |
| Written by Gabriella Sannino | |
| Monday, 18 October 2010 14:16 | |
| We already know search engine optimization includes, in part, a keyword-finding treasure hunt. We know they should be in your title; call us old-fashioned, but tradition says they should be in your first and last paragraph as well, and we agree. We also know that in a perfect world you should have your keyword in the page URL. Of course, these aren’t the only places you should focus your efforts. Let’s not forget other keywords can be found (i.e. placed) in the code, your HTML tags, description and so on. Then you have the process of developing a per page keyword matrix, where you choose the most appropriate phrases for each page. In short, you take the results of your keyword treasure hunt and fine tune the content, HTML, URLs and Meta tags. Sounds like loads of fun, right? ![]() Now, it’s no surprise the Big Three (Google, Bing, Yahoo – in order of search market share) whnat to keep their algorithm foundations a secret. Each engine wants to be able to claim the prize for having the most valuable search results with the least amount of spam. That’s just good common business sense. Besides, if you have any idea how many patents the SEs have submitted in general and/or those for specific engines, you’ll probably get tired of even thinking about trying to trace the algorithms down. If you could, but you can’t, so we move on. Last I heard, Google alone uses over 200 factors for ranking, each with placing their own weight and are constantly changing/evolving. Umm... you were talking about relevance…I was. And I’m getting to it. It’s important. #thatisall Relevance is like adding “U.S.” to “President”. Automatically, everybody knows who I mean, right? “U.S.” adds a little clarity to which president I’m complaining talking about. So it works for the search engines. If all you talk about is SEO, but you never include “services”, well… how are the SEs supposed to know you’re frantically pedaling your services instead of freely sharing information? Again, this is relevance. Now, you may be tired of hearing about relevance, but it will never disappear – whether it’s Google Instant or Google Light Speed – in terms of ranking factors. If the SEs took out relevance as a factor, it’d be the equivalent of signing their death warrant. With the firing squad waiting patiently a few feet away. Relevance stretches across all areas of a website. Then, it stretches across a page. Then, it hits all those convenient, sweet, juicy links. To get a really good idea of how relevance works, let’s create an imaginary single page. Targets;
Content Targeting;
Linkage;
Link text and surrounding: Over at Example Site, So in So wrote about semantic engagement with the masses using SEO and social media. They had some interesting points I’d like to expound upon.
Link text and surrounding: Now, plenty of people say SEO and social media go hand-in-hand. I’m old school, but How to Combine SEO and Social Media for a Business that Rocks really made me sit down and think. Can the two really exist and work together?
Order from the ChaosNow, the “page” above was thrown together, but I hope you get the idea of how relevance works throughout a page, including links. However, there should always be an end goal in mind; you know, like, instead of “bringing in a lot of traffic”, your goal might be something like… “bringing in a lot of the right traffic that wants to know more about your product” sounds good. Look. Everything you do, whether for your site or a single page, is some form of content that can be used to further convince the search engines that your page is SERIOUSLY about your keyword(s). Don’t throw in non-relevant, though trendy, topics to get more traffic because a) it won’t be the right type of traffic and b) it will decrease the relevance of your on page content. If you, at least loosely, follow the outline above, you’ll also end up having visitors that trust you to deliver on the promised title and/or description. Overall, relevance is a good thing. It’s a great thing. In fact, it’s THE thing (well, once you throw in equally unimportant things like quality) to get better rankings, more visitors and more conversions. How do you measure your relevance? More articles by this author | |
| Last Updated on Monday, 18 October 2010 18:51 |
Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC
| Playing with Google Conversational Search Earlier today Danny Sullivan, via SEL, was writing about Google Conversational search, which was an [ ... ] | The Battle for the Living Room; Xbox One Ok, I was tempted to actually write that “Xbox Won”, but I guess that'll do. As I sa [ ... ] |
Comments
However, I wonder how many potential clients for SEO- for example- will be looking for 'semantic engagement' or other such phrases? Maybe other SEO professionals...but not potential clients? The danger in some on-page targeting is that you forget about how people- people not in the industry- actually search for things. The important thing to bear in mind is- relevance to who? If your traffic 'wants to know more about your product', chances are they are outside whatever industry you're in. Then you have to make sure you target at those people specifically and this may mean more general keywords.
Just a thought. Love the blog and well done all!
Thanks for the great post, Gabriella.
You have an excellent point, though, and one we're always talking about over the Level343 water cooler. Always make sure you target your audience specifically.
We are all excited about this new site thanks for cheering us on!
@Cordelia- I think proper keyword research will reveal the terms most searched for in a particular case. "Semantic engagement" was just an example.
Using Google's Wonder Wheel is my favorite approach. Love that thing!
Nice post, thanks for sharing
Awww Cordelia how sweet of you to come back & clarify :* but, suffice it to say I'm made of thicker skin ;)
@Craig Sometimes stepping away from the project and visualizing what will ultimately make people "act"? Yes, relevance.
@Vicki thanks for your kind words and encouragement. What I've realized after years of being online is no matter how much things are second nature to me there are many out there that are just starting.
RSS feed for comments to this post