Google's Algorithm Leaked! - A...
SEO Excuse #143; The other...
Digital Barter Could Fill Knowledge...
I was reading some guy's promotional material today and noted he had 'Done SEO for some BIG corporations'. Like...
Learn how to maintain multiple business listings with a new[…]
Please visit http://www.google.com/offers/business/start to learn how Google Offers on Google[…]
http://stewartmedia.biz This week I answer some questions about the Google[…]
Get an under the hood look at the next frontier[…]
| The Dangers in Proclaiming the Demise of SEO |
| Written by Barry Adams | |
| Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:07 | |
| It almost seems to be a new trend: Proclaiming the death of SEO, an end to search engine optimisers, the final nail in the coffin of this most despised of online marketing disciplines. I've been guilty of it myself, in some ways. But I've come to realise that it's a very dangerous trend, and a very irresponsible one. The FUD GameIn an atmosphere already rife with FUD - fear, uncertainty, and doubt - when such a destructive message is repeated often enough, many will eventually accept it as gospel. And that has wide-ranging repercussions.
Far from dead; it's essential!Most SEO-less ventures will fail, because few websites will be able to maintain long term traffic figures from alternative sources. Without SEO, many sites might not even rank on their own branded terms. Without SEO, most websites are doomed to fail.
SEO is Dead! SEO is Dead! (please link to me..)Writing about the death of SEO, whether done for the sake of linkbait, controversy, or under the guise of opinion, is dangerous and irresponsible. Because not only is it demonstrably false, it is also actively harmful for the online marketing industry as a whole.
You'll probably say yes to the first question, and you may even respond affirmatively to the second. But the third question, that's the tough one. As an online marketer, when you proclaim the death of SEO you're not just thrusting a knife into the backs of SEO professionals around the world. You are actually digging your own profession's grave. This type of writing undermines the credibility of your industry and does nothing but fan the flames of uncertainty. More articles by this author | |
| Last Updated on Thursday, 28 October 2010 14:02 |
Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC
| Is Google Really De-indexing Free Directories? Today Barry Schwartz reported on a WebmasterWorld thread in which an SEO had noticed that Google has [ ... ] | Strange SERPs Could Be Penguin 1.1 There is evidence today that Google may have updated Penguin. While there is no official word on t [ ... ] |
Comments
I call it cheap link bait.
Completely agree. It seems that SEO gets its fair share of these 'linkbait' (I use that word very very loosely - as it is a very poor example of linkbait) from this source - and from very credible sources such as Edelman.
As you have said, the net result potential is a number of social websites, with little or no consideration for search at its heart - and subsequently an ever increasing reliance on paid sources such as PPC or Display.
Not doing so means a highly umbalanced campaign and one that in the long term may not perform as cost-effectively as it could do with organic search included.
It is always easier to bash something you don't understand, than to take the time to understand it and make a more informed decision or stance afterwards.
More often than not, it usually comes from some self proclaimed "SM guru" (i know i'm treading on thin ice here, and that is a very big generalisation i admit
Replacing the bullsh*t with solid info is a respectable goal, though not necessarily a realistic one
We have to do our best though.
RSS feed for comments to this post