Banner

Follow Along

RSS Feed Join Us on Twitter On Facebook

Get Engaged

Banner

Featured Article

Getting a grip on social signals in searchGetting a grip on social signals in  searchIf there's one thing that has driven me nuts over the last 6 months it's the non-stop chatter and search...
Read More >>

Latest Comments

Latest Articles

Will Googles Agent Rank Ever Become a Ranking Factor?Will Google's Agent Rank Ever...
I've seen some interesting discussions recently on the question of whether authority (Agent Rank)...
Read More >>
Algorithm Updates vs Manual Penalties - Some People Still Don’t Get ItAlgorithm Updates vs Manual Penalties...
In the fallout of the last publicly announced (sorta) Panda update and as the...
Read More >>
3 Quick Fixes to Enterprise-Level Technical SEO3 Quick Fixes to Enterprise-Level...
As Google continues to transpose the idea and essence of the real world, physical marketplace...
Read More >>

Our Sponsors

Banner
Banner
Banner

Latest Search Videos

Join Us

Banner
Banner
The SEO Magic Bullet; 2011 Edition
Written by David Harry
Thursday, 03 February 2011 13:53

Keeping perspective

As the new year began we saw a deluge of the usual round up and 'best of' posts. One of these that I came across was talking about the BEST SEO post of 2010 and as their pick they chose Bill's reasonable surfer patent coverage. Ok great, Bill rocks, so what's the problem?

Well, the problem my weary web warrior is that there was a story behind it all. The morning it came out Rand was at a conference (SMX London I believe) and stood up to proclaim this 'new' method from Google and madness ensued.

My friends, there is no magic bullet and it's just bad form to go screaming from the mountaintops that which may or may not be the truth.

No bull

 

I have found the holy grail!

The first thing to get your head around is that patents are the past and research papers are the future. Next, we need to consider that many patent awards are many years old and the tech was either used, evolved or abandoned altogether. And last, but most certainly NOT least, one has to have some context. Allow me to explain...

How about this, I will write up just a single patent from Google on geo-local goodiness. Something somewhat recent. Let's use this one;

Indexing documents according to geo-graphic relevance

Of course I could really play this thing up and write a post that makes it seem like the hottest new thing that Google is doing. It was awarded in late 2010 so it must be something super secret and important right? Uh uh. It's just a single patent. You have no context.

Here's a list of geo local patents from the last few years;

WOW... now THAT is what I call context!

The point here being that even if I spent the time to group and then analyze ALL of those patents, I'd still be nowhere. We still don't know which elements were used. We haven't a clue as to the weighting of the various factors contained in each. In short, it's a fools game.

Be the Wolf not the Sheeple

If you're going to make a 2011 SEO Resolution, then make it one of thinking critically when you read some of the hyperbole that plagues the SEO (media) spaces. Reading and analyzing papers and patents from the major engines is about insight, not definitive answers. In most cases, especially last year's reasonable surfer fiasco, statements about any ONE filing should be taken with a grain of salt.

Be the wolf not the sheep

There is no magic bullet to be found here (nothing to see, move along). If you REALLY want to learn about how search engines work, great. But never be fooled into thinking that any of us will ever be able to reverse engineer Google's algorithms. It's that simple. Anyone that tells you different is either lying or ignorant.

Past Editions;

The Magic Bullet - A chat with Bill Slawski - 2007
SEO Magic Bullet: 2010 Edition


David Harry -

Hi my name is Dave and I, am an algo-holic

I am an avid search geek that spends most of his time reading about and playing with search engines. My main passion has always been about the technical side of things from a strong perspective rooted in IR and related technologies.You can find me providing SEO consulting services for Verve Developments.

You can also hook up with me via

Read More >>


More articles by this author

Google Hacks & Dorks for fun and  profitGoogle Hacks & Dorks for fun and profit
Recently someone was asking me about Google's advanced operators and...
Read More >>
Last Updated on Thursday, 03 February 2011 14:10
 

Comments  

 
0 #1 Amanda 2011-02-03 14:33
If you want to see the claims as Google originally intended them in US 2010/0250552 A1 (you'll note that claims 2-24 have been canceled and, as of publication, only claim 1 is pending)... I downloaded them from PAIR and uploaded it here:

http://www.amandaorson.com/go/googleapp.pdf

On October 15th they entered a supplemental Preliminary Amendment including claims 25-43 which are substantively very similar to the above claims.

For those that aren't patent savvy, claims are the "meat" of a patent- without them, you have nothing to defend or 'claim' ownership to.

And, FYI, this is the inventor: http://www.google.com/programming-contest/winner.html
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Amanda 2011-02-03 14:44
Also- wanted to point something out:

"It was awarded in late 2010 so it must be something super secret and important right?"

This is inaccurate.

This patent was PUBLISHED 9/30/10 and filed 6/15/10.

It's official status is "Application Dispatched from Preexam, Not Yet Docketed "

There is a HUGE distinction between applications being published and patents being awarded. I could file an application today claiming to have invented a hammer and my application will be PUBLISHED (unless you file a document specifically requesting them not to, called a "Non Publication Request") but I most certainly won't get a patent for it.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Tad Miller 2011-02-03 22:28
I know their is no magic bullet, but I'll settle for a BB! :P
Quote
 
 
0 #4 Bill Slawski 2011-02-03 22:33
What I loved about the reasonable surfer patent wasn't that it give us a stark and sudden awareness of how Google might be weighing links different, but rather it confirmed something that we already knew about if we were paying attention, and let us see some of the assumptions about the weight that a link might carry based upon how a link might be presented on a page.

As always, this is spot on:

"Reading and analyzing papers and patents from the major engines is about insight, not definitive answers."

There have been some patents from places like Google that spot on in their description, and what ends up being developed by the search engine, like the handful of patents that described how Google personalized search would be set up. But, most patents provide information about processes that aren't so clear and transparent, and are difficult to tell if they've been implemented.

I don't usually read patents or white papers to tell how a search engine does something. I read them to come up with questions that I might not have considered asking without having read those patents or papers.
Quote
 
 
0 #5 David Harry 2011-02-03 22:56
@Amanda - thanks for dropping in ya mad geek! While I appreciate the head's up and the correction, the point of the post was actually more about people running wild with filings. And at the end of the day, awarded or not, to me the exercise is more about getting into the headspace of the engineers, than the exact method in question. Know what I mean? Thanks again for the head's up tho.

@Tad - we should open a new agency; Red Ryder SEO

@Bill - hey bro, nice to see ya. I remember when we started this 'series' back in 07, oddly it seems not a whole lot has changed out there as far as the perceptions of patents/papers and how the SEO media uses it.

I certainly agree on that last part about questions. Many times I end up much the same. Finding things in an offering that leads me to dig deeper into a given methodology and how I might find some actionable elements to test/research. And well, end of the day, it's just fascinating to consider the task of indexing the world's information. It never get's old.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Getting Around the Site

Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC

What's New?