There was a post earlier today from Google stating that they're ramping up the social elements in the SERPs....
Digital Marketing; Weekly - Issue...
Matt Cutts on upcoming changes...
Exciting times at SNC; welcome...
In this video interview link building expert Jim Boykin explains[…]
Join Nick Mihailovski and Ikai Lan from the Analytics and[…]
Could you please give details on what should be included[…]
| Dear Google: This is war |
| Written by Ian Lurie | |
| Wednesday, 19 October 2011 13:18 | |
| Dear Google: With your announcement yesterday, you've become the enemy. My company is a Google Analytics Partner. We promote the heck out of Google Analytics, Adwords and your products. I've worked hard to emphasize to my clients that you're not Evil, or Good. You're just doing your job. We've kept our clients within your terms of service, and basically behaved ourselves. But now you're going to hide a sizable chunk of referring organic keyword data. That's information I need to justify your value to my clients: Once you shut down organic search data from 'signed in' users, I lose any accurate picture of traffic generated by organic Google rankings. It's not about privacyDon't try to say this is a privacy thing. It. is. not. How exactly does this protect privacy, when you tie the text of e-mails to your advertising platform? How does this protect privacy when you're photographing people's streets, homes and whatever else you can lay your hands on? Don't get me wrong - I've not opposed e-mail ads, or Street View. But you can't shut down search query data and then protest privacy. That's like leaving one bite of steak on your plate and saying you're a vegetarian. Are you honestly telling me you had no way to deliver anonymous counts of keyword searches by signed-in users? You've never found a way to do this? 'Cause that sounds like a load of horse hooey, if ever I've heard one.
The real reasonYou've done this for one reason, and one reason only: To shut out competing ad networks. By removing this data from the referring query string (oh, you didn't think we'd notice?!) you've made it far harder for third-party ad networks to measure and quantify traffic quality. Plus, you no longer have to justify ranking results, OR Adwords data. Personalization already scrambles the crap out of them. Without accurate search query data, we have no way to check your math on Google Adwords search counts. I guess we have to trust you. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Cough. Sniff. Sob. Ain't gonna happen.![]() You've made yourself into just another vendor we should never, ever, trust. It'll be interesting to see how many SEOs don their black hats after this. I certainly don't feel as compelled as I once was to follow your terms of service. And I'm not the only one. Some pretty white-hat, respectable people are pretty pissed off. So, nice job. You've made your feelings clear. I wonder how things are going to go for you in Washington DC after this? Not well, I think. Not well at all. Signed; Your former friend and believer, Ian More articles by this author | |
| Last Updated on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 13:27 |
Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC
| The Battle for the Living Room; Xbox One Ok, I was tempted to actually write that “Xbox Won”, but I guess that'll do. As I sa [ ... ] | Digital Marketing; Weekly - Issue 3 YouTube Trends Map One of the coolest new Trends tools to be rolled out is YouTube Trends which o [ ... ] |
Comments
I hope to see some official responses from Google or Matt Cutts but I'm not holding my breath.
The worst part is Google don't really care what SEO's think, this is a massive PR win for them in the eyes of the common man and that's what they care about. Of course that doesn't mean we can't fight back, but they're unlikely to undo the change now.
This should present a good opportunity for Facebook advertising once they release keywords into thier advertising algos in the upcoming quarter.
Shame in you Google! Shame on you!
The only thing we can control is our response.
I suspect that any competitive advantage this move might give them was simply gravy - an unintended side-effect of a preemptive action.
As you say Ian, this isn't about Privacy. I can't see Google going back on this decision.
They say the change will only affect "single digit" searches. You'd have to be really naive to think this number won't grow - either naturally or by other changes Google makes in the name of "privacy".
RSS feed for comments to this post