Has anyone else noticed that there seems to be some changes to the replies one receives when filing a...
What Google Knows & The...
Link Values Simplified
Why Can't We Killl Bad...
In this video interview link building expert Jim Boykin explains[…]
Join Nick Mihailovski and Ikai Lan from the Analytics and[…]
Could you please give details on what should be included[…]
| Where SEO meets Quantum Physics |
| Written by Barry Adams | |
| Tuesday, 24 January 2012 14:25 | |
| The Heisenberg Ranking Uncertainty Principle - or - Schrödinger's Rank. Call me a geek (because I am one) but I think there are a lot of similarities between SEO and Quantum Physics. Yes, I know, it sounds ridiculous. Bear with me, it'll make sense. Well, actually, it probably won't, but don't let that stop you. You've probably heard about some of quantum theory's more counter-intuitive aspects, as made clear through the Schrödinger's Cat thought experiment or the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. What these aspects boil down to is that at the smallest level we currently understand, our universe basically doesn't make any sense. Instead of the usual hard & fast rules of how things work, in the quantum realm chance and endless possibilities are the norm. Particles exist in many different states at the same time, only to 'choose' a fixed state at random when they're finally observed. Constant Chaos; welcome to SEOThis is actually very similar to how SEO works - especially rankings on search engines: you never know exactly where a website ranks for a given keyword until you type it in the search box and observe the results. Up until that moment the website's rank exists in a state of flux, as part of a near endless realm of possibilities.
With the search engines' ongoing advances in localisation and personalisation, endeavouring to make the SERPs you see as relevant as possible for you and you alone, all semblance of predictability and cause & effect has gone straight out the window. While in most cases we know which buttons to push to cajole the rankings machine in to moving in a certain direction, we never know how far it'll go or how we'll eventually end up straying from our envisioned goal. All this SEO shtick does feel like a roll of the dice sometimes, doesn't it? We do our best to send all the right signals in to this big black search engine box, and hope that what comes out more or less meets our expectations. More often than not, it doesn't. We might as well be trying to catch Higgs-bosons with our bare hands. Maybe we should stop calling ourselves SEOs and instead re-invent ourselves as Ranking Physicists, create our own 27km Keyword Collider experiment and try to discover the Grand SERP Unification Theory. The only thing that stops me is that this would elevate the search engines to the status of fickle, omnipotent deities that can - and do - change the laws of ranking physics on us on a daily basis. It would be an unfair playing field, and in such a scenario I have something in common with that most illustrious of fictional space-faring captains, James T. Kirk: I cheat. More articles by this author | |
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 15:13 |
Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC
| Digital Marketing Weekly - Issue 4 Linked to last week's Google I/O event in San Francisco there is a lot of new features and updates [ ... ] | Playing with Google Conversational Search Earlier today Danny Sullivan, via SEL, was writing about Google Conversational search, which was an [ ... ] |
Comments
I've thought about this analogy as well. Not sure it completely aligns, but it is a good conceptual tool for explaining why SEO is such a challenging marketing channel.
RSS feed for comments to this post