Banner

Follow Along

RSS Feed Join Us on Twitter On Facebook

Get Engaged

Banner

Featured Article

Google Updates Social SearchGoogle Updates Social SearchThere was a post earlier today from Google stating that they're ramping up the social elements in the SERPs....
Read More >>

Latest Comments

Related Reading

Latest Articles

Did Google ease off Panda and the tighten thin content manual penalty?Did Google ease off Panda...
Earlier this week there was a confirmation from Google about a recent Panda update....
Read More >>
Is Technorati feeling the Google heat?Is Technorati feeling the Google...
Ok, so yesterday I was reporting about some potential red flags in the world...
Read More >>
Digital Marketing Weekly - Issue 4Digital Marketing Weekly - Issue...
Linked to last week's Google I/O event in San Francisco there is a lot of...
Read More >>

Our Sponsors

Banner
Banner
Banner

Latest Search Videos

Join Us

Banner
Hijacked SERPs? What's up Google?
Wednesday, 07 November 2012 14:44

hijacked SERPs!An interesting article from yesterday has brought to light a potential problem with Google's search algorithm concerning attribution.

Briefly, attribution, in search quality speak, is 'credit where credit's due'. In other words, in the case of duplicate content, making sure the original document, not the dupe, gets ranked. Google tries to ensure this by a)not displaying duplicate content in SERPs, and b) ranking the url with the highest PageRank, whenever a duplicate presents it's self.

Taking advantage of these 'rules', Dan Petrovic of Dejan SEO set out to place duplicate content on his site and out-rank the creators. And he did it. It seems as though Mr. Petrovic was able to hijack a number of SERPs by simply copying content from a high ranking page and placing it on his larger, more authorative site. Read the article to find out how exactly he did this.

So what does this mean? This ovbiously goes against what Google had in mind when they implemented attribution into their search algo. There's likely not a lot of benefit for larger sites to excercise these tactics, but the negative effects on smaller sites not ranking for their own original content could be devestating.

What do you think? Can we chalk it up to a search algo that is and never will perfect, and expect some collateral damage in the name of cause, or does Google need to get on this?

 


 

Comments  

 
0 #1 سایپا 2014-04-15 10:56
Thank you for proving those links on Panda, Penguin and search quality updates.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 تور چین 2014-04-16 12:16
In addition to art that will give you good
Quote
 
 
0 #3 درب اتوماتیک 2014-04-28 12:09
Keep blogging.ur site is good.and finelly ur site going to in high position
Quote
 
 
0 #4 نمای کامپوزیت 2014-06-26 08:00
Great post! Useful to have an 'at a glance' type post informing us on the latest relevant news for sure!
Quote
 
 
0 #5 دوربین مدار بسته 2014-06-29 12:12
Like they want to get every last nickle they can, by screwing people over. Don't know how that's a formula for success or long term mutual benefit ... Just the reality though.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Getting Around the Site

Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC

What's New?