Follow Along

RSS Feed Join Us on Twitter On Facebook

Get Engaged


Featured Article

Digital Marketing Insights; Integrated SEO 2013Digital Marketing Insights; Integrated SEO 2013Hello and welcome to the first of many Google Plus Hangouts here on SNC. To get things rolling our first session...

Latest Comments

Related Reading

Latest Articles

Digital Marketing Insights; Integrated SEO 2013Digital Marketing Insights; Integrated SEO...
Hello and welcome to the first of many Google Plus Hangouts here on SNC. To...

Our Sponsors


Latest Search Videos

Join Us

Does Google give big brands a pass?
Written by David Harry
Thursday, 04 April 2013 06:15

While wandering the halls of Facebook yesterday, I came across this;

Google and Big Brands

Which was referencing a post over on SER about Google and Brands. There has been a long-standing thought train in the SEO world that brands get an advantage from Google in the form of rankings or penalization issues. Seriously, just look at this SERP.

But is this truly the case?

Big Brands and Google rankings

This one is the easier of the two folks. I can tell you for a fact that I have never seen mention of ay type of algorithm in a patent or research paper, that seeks to add some sort of boosting for a given entity. Indeed it would make little sense to even do that because then you'd need a room full of monkeys coding in brand name after brand name.

What likely is the case is that brands tend to have;

  • More links
  • Higher quality links
  • Greater trust and authority
  • Higher social activity
  • More non link citations and co-citations
  • On and on and on..

It is merely the result of the myriad of other signals and scoring mechanisms which Google uses to display search results. We can also add to that the fact that a lot of larger brands have hopped onto the SEO bandwagon over the last decade and generally have larger budgets to throw at it.


Big Brands and Google Penalties

So onto the next roll of tinfoil. Do the larger brands get a pass or preferential treatment when it comes to penalties?

Again, I'd say no... or at least “not really”. As Senor Cutts intimated recently at SMX, it indeed does happen, but it just isn't publicized. In fact, unless some astute SEO actually picks up on it, it will indeed fly under the radar. The brand in question isn't about to start telling the world (and potential investors) that it's happening.

As someone that has done a lot of consulting to companies that get whacked, many of them being known entities, it probably happens far more than most believe. It just isn't widely reported. Actually, now that I think about it... do small brands report when they've been whacked? Probably not. It is what it is...

Now, do they 'seem' to be able to get out of the penalty box easier? Entirely possible. I have managed to get large brands back in faster than smaller offenders. Why? One would assume the quality control aspect that some companes are expected to show up in the results.


If I had to choose

All of this being said; which would I choose? That's a bit of a no-brainer and any SEO that's worked a larger brand knows that it is indeed a lot easier to rank things with a larger brand. You can probably sneeze at a new keyword and get it ranking in fairly short order. That of course, often depends on the existing strength of the domain and SEO readiness of the site.

The flip side is that a smaller entity (SMB) can often be more nimble and getting things done is far easier. Large brands tend to move like sloths and at times one wonders why they even bother making recommendations since it can take months to be acted upon, if at all. There's advantages to each.

At the end of the day it's not really Google giving brands preferential treatment. It's the simple fact that they have more authority.

David Harry -

Hi my name is Dave and I, am an algo-holic

I am an avid search geek that spends most of his time reading about and playing with search engines. My main passion has always been about the technical side of things from a strong perspective rooted in IR and related technologies.You can find me providing SEO consulting services for Verve Developments.

You can also hook up with me via


More articles by this author

Google on Guest Blogging; be afraid, be very afraidGoogle on Guest Blogging; be afraid, be very afraid
So here we are again huh? It was just a...
Google Hacks & Dorks for fun and  profitGoogle Hacks & Dorks for fun and profit
Recently someone was asking me about Google's advanced operators and...
Last Updated on Thursday, 04 April 2013 07:16


0 #1 Rick Noel 2013-04-04 15:44
Nice piece David and I tend to agree with your logic. Thought I strongly believe AdWords spend does not influence the organic algorithm directly, one has to wonder if a Google agency rep would be able to shake the tree a bit on reconsideration requests for manual penalties on behalf of clients with 6 and 7 figure monthly ad spends. The flip side is where else can you buy that much search inventory or even half that much? Thank for sharing.

Add comment

Security code

Getting Around the Site

Home - all the latest on SNC
SEO - our collection of SEO articles
Technical SEO - for the geeks
Latest News - latest news in search
Analytics - measure up and convert
RSS Rack - feeds from around the industry
Search - looking for something specific?
Authors - Author Login
SEO Training - Our sister site
Contact Us - get in touch with SNC

What's New?

All content and images copyright Search News Central 2014
SNC is a Verve Developments production, the Forensic SEO Specialists- where Gypsies roam.