<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>SERP Out – Brand & query  refinements</title>
		<description>Discuss SERP Out – Brand & query  refinements</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20110222139/General-SEO/serp-out-brand-a-query-refinements.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/139/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Lee says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20110222139/General-SEO/serp-out-brand-a-query-refinements.html#comment-377</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great insight Dave - isn't it amazing how much we learn when we look at SERPs? I often use the 'searches related to' as a sign of intent, and select information or transactional keywords as appropriate. Good stuff.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 02:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20110222139/General-SEO/serp-out-brand-a-query-refinements.html#comment-377</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vertical Measures says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20110222139/General-SEO/serp-out-brand-a-query-refinements.html#comment-376</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great insights, David. A lot of people don't take query refinements into consideration so I'm glad you have pointed that out.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Vertical Measures</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20110222139/General-SEO/serp-out-brand-a-query-refinements.html#comment-376</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
