<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>GOOGLE search patents 2011</title>
		<description>Discuss GOOGLE search patents 2011</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20111227221/Technical/google-search-patents-2011.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 09:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/221/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Sean says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20111227221/Technical/google-search-patents-2011.html#comment-994</link>
			<description><![CDATA["Oh, there's nothing to read nowadays" "People are hording all the knowledge to themselves" Seriously if you want to know what Google are doing/considering then just read this post. Great work Dave!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20111227221/Technical/google-search-patents-2011.html#comment-994</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rafael Montilla says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20111227221/Technical/google-search-patents-2011.html#comment-991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Dave! It is very helpfull, it helps me to understand a little more the algo.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rafael Montilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20111227221/Technical/google-search-patents-2011.html#comment-991</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
