<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Google page layout algorithm; page segmentation gets a new twist</title>
		<description>Discuss Google page layout algorithm; page segmentation gets a new twist</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:22:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/239/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Barry Adams says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html#comment-1059</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Ah, yes. Are these the same guys that said that, at full roll-out, SSL search would only affect single-digit percentages of searches? Right.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Barry Adams</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html#comment-1059</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Harry says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html#comment-1056</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The important thing is the 1% number. I would imagine in query spaces where this is normal (ecommerce sites for example tend to have top graphics) there wouldn't be a problem. Secondly, this is seemingly about ads. A graphic on the site that doesn't link out. Doesn't lead to a redirect of aff page. That doesn't have advertising text in the image (their quite adept at OSC). Isn't going to be an issue. Methinks you're safe]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Harry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html#comment-1056</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Deep Breath says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html#comment-1055</link>
			<description><![CDATA[User-friendly approach of Google's algorithm is always welcome but I don't understand when Matt says that websites with less content above-the-fold will be affected. My concern is for Artist/Band/Music websites in which larger images and videos are displayed above-the-fold and this is also for better user experience! There is no other way to do this on such websites. Will these sites also be affected by this layout algorithm update. I'll be glad to get an answer from Google in this regards and some tips that can help such websites perform better despite this update.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Deep Breath</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120120239/Latest/google-page-layout-algorithm-page-segmentation-gets-a-new-twist.html#comment-1055</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
