<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Forbes showing the SEO love again!</title>
		<description>Discuss Forbes showing the SEO love again!</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/241/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>David Harry says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Lol funny stuff Alan, I like it bro. @Tad, Danny most certainly does have a long standing habit of fighting these kind of situations and pretty much as I said off the top, was kinda having one of those days everything went wrong. An SEO Dojo member brought it to me at just the 'write' moment.... and before I knew it this sprang to life. king the SEO haters post... I have a 'SEO is dead' one over on SEObullshit.com hehe]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Harry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1068</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tad Chef says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dave, it's better not to reply each time but just to link to a kind of FAQ for these kind of people. I have one post that's still as valid as 5 years ago: http://seo2.0.onreact.com/10-reasons-why-seo-haters-are-plainly-wrong Danny seems to have a well of stamina to deal with that kind of attacks so often.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tad Chef</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1067</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Alan Bleiweiss says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You didn't dumb it down enough. Too many high-falutin' snake-oil words in your rebuttal. Let me help you out. Instead of "We ensure keyword strategies target relevant market demographics" Try "We find the best cheese to lure unsuspecting web-surfing mice into our client's mouse-traps". Or "We know that sheep like to eat grass. So we find the best grass to lure the sheep. To slaughter at the hands of our client's products and services".]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1066</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Harry says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ladies... good evening. His tone seemed playful enough and we exchanged a few tweets. I won't give up on ol Bill just yet. There's always hope right? A of SEOs don't really know how a search engine works, so best we hit the mirror first. But as U know, tis part of my mission, (lot?) in life. But most certainly it is always about the users for me. I am not here to clutter the web with crap. My job is to help build the brand, to equal the scales for mom and pop, to deliver value to the users as wel as the client. Sadly there is a lot of crap hats out there... but all industries deal with it (way more contractor jokes out there than SEO ones). So, let me leave a fun journo bit of humour; "Journalists are like dogs, when ever anything moves they begin to bark" - Arthur Schopenhauer]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Harry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1065</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marjory says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1064</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Although, the page is ranking number 2 on Google News for 'Cat Deeley' so he must have picked up a few things about SEO.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marjory</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1064</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marjory says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1063</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I can see how he would get confused though. I can't believe how many people don't get the importance of understanding how search engines work and ... how many don't get it. Not to mention ... how searchers work which is the point in the end, isn't it? p.s. Oh Gabby - if only.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Marjory</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 01:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1063</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gabriella Sannino says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I’m pretty sure I just fell in love with you. No pressure. We can take it slow....:) ❤ ❤ ❤]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Gabriella Sannino</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120123241/Latest/forbes-showing-the-seo-love-again.html#comment-1062</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
