<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Google's got a brand new bag; rank modifying spam patent</title>
		<description>Discuss Google's got a brand new bag; rank modifying spam patent</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 08:33:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/343/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jonny Ross says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1524</link>
			<description><![CDATA[help! ok so i have read this post a few times, can someone give 2/3 sentence conclusion on this? Jonny]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jonny Ross</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 12:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1524</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Studiumcirclus says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[So "Google's got a brand new bag" becomes "Google bought a bag a year or two ago and may or may not have used it" :) - amusing]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Studiumcirclus</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1516</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>@steveplunkett says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1514</link>
			<description><![CDATA[At some point, we have to lead... (tosses Dave a Molson because it is Friday) and yes sir.. you are a knight of the roundtable for seo, charged with defending the kingdom of our careers.. =)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>@steveplunkett</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1514</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rosana L says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1512</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Every time I read one of these posts that intend to freak people out I get even more fed up. Clients and bosses read blog posts or forums online and take the info as it is true, and then the phone calls begin: freak out, did you read this, blah blah blah. What a way to confuse and scare people ....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rosana L</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1512</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Harry says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1511</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yea, initially we kinda laughed about it (Dojo chat room) because it seemed to just be a slow news week or something. That we'd not had a good drama in a while and it was due. Then of course I had people telling me Tom was a respected author. I noticed Bill getting a little more involved. I realized that maybe this was one that I might want to get involved in. Seems now I am a troll (on twitter). Those of ya that know me, know that I've long gone off on this kinda shit.. from LSI ro LDA to reasonable surfer patents and the SEO magic bullet. I do actually give a shit about this kinda atuff cause it not only can confuse new SEOs, but we end up having to try and explain to clients that it is misinformation. A little easier for me cause of my body of work, but what about some young SEO just building a client base? He now has to try and show that he's wiser than a respected Zdnet author. I'd bet that's not an easy task. Ya know?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Harry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1511</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DennisG says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1510</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks for jumping on this David, and not linking to the ZDnet article, because it smells too much like LinkBait. It is clear to me Tom is the one who is confused, not the people who have responded with a comment. Normally I don't spend any time on drama like this, which is why I like Netmeg's response (as always). But I was in the mood to push back yesterday, so left a couple myself as well... Now, back to do some great SEO work, and get ahead of the n00bs]]></description>
			<dc:creator>DennisG</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1510</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rafael Montilla says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1509</link>
			<description><![CDATA[He does not understand, what Quality Content means. "If you try to improve the quality of your site, that can work against you." :zzz Quality Content is for the user, not for the search engines, Google likes to give the user the best Quality Content. Google is like an adviser, when a user search for any information, Google wants to give the best advise and the best advise will be on the website that has Quality Content.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Rafael Montilla</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1509</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>netmeg says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1508</link>
			<description><![CDATA[SEO freakout drama is so funny. It makes me go ha ha. Seriously, is there some kind of a calendar app listing the schedule for this stuff, cause I'd like to subscribe to it. It happens on such a regular basis, there SHOULD be a calendar (oh yea - THAT time of the month again...)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>netmeg</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1508</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Harry says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1507</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hey Raf, funny that... cause as I mentioned it actually had me up in the wee hrs of the morning. I have no idea if Tom 'gets' SEO, information retrieval nor AIR (adversarial information retrieval). At least to the point that he should be writing about it as such. @Jim - I hadn't actually heard of Tom before this, but the first time the article was brought to my attention, it was a Dojo member that said something along the lines of "He usually writes better stuff that this. It's kind of sad to see" You saying that seeing his name made you take it more seriously initially, does speak volumes though. I do have to think, as I noted in the post, that part of the problem is that he (only?) read the post from SEO Book, whom most of us know to be edgy on a good day. I guess he wasn't really aware of that? Not sure. And I don't really want to put the blame anywhere. He's not the first, nor will be the last, to get caught up in the confusing world of patent filings. This has happened before and will happen again. I suppose I just feel the need to try and add some context to it each time it happens. He he... sounds like a good bit for Webcology tho no?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Harry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1507</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>jim hedger says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1506</link>
			<description><![CDATA[That was an unfortunate article. Tom Foremski is usually better than that. I took the headline a little more seriously when I saw Tom's name beneath it. Was deeply unimpressed when reading it though. Again, Foremski is usually better than this piece. Mea Culpa Tom?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>jim hedger</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120830343/Latest/googles-got-a-brand-new-bag.html#comment-1506</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
