<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Screwed your authorship mark-up?  Google's got you covered</title>
		<description>Discuss Screwed your authorship mark-up?  Google's got you covered</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/347/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Janet Driscoll Mille says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1575</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Bobby, Google does not allow "brand" author markup because it considers an author to be an individual. Janet]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Janet Driscoll Mille</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1575</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bobby says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1574</link>
			<description><![CDATA[pls reply any one on this.....]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1574</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bobby says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1573</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Can we give company google+ profile for authorship markup instead of personal profile]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 11:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1573</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bill says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1552</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I am sure for the average Joe making the correct mark up is not easy. The fact that many webmasters are getting it wrong only adds to the fact the most are going to screw it up. It is good that Google has been proactive as you describe. I have done the mark up for most of my sites.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1552</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Harry says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Oh my, please do write away Janet!! I just quickly took some screens and mused about what I was seeing. Over the coming weeks I shall certainly start to look deeper and play with it more (added a few more links to my G+ profile today, see what comes of it). It is certainly telling as far as how their starting to make some connections Reminds me a bit of the ol social graph API that they took down. Certainly goes even further imo, be sure to check the link at the end to the named entities stuff. Then of course we consider the social graph and knowledge graph stuff and some patterns likely emerge (even the profile entities role in reviews/local) Let me know when you post yours so I can add a linkee onto this one.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Harry</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1526</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Janet Driscoll Mille says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1525</link>
			<description><![CDATA[OK, so you beat me to the punch on this one. I was working on an article about this. On our site, we saw the same thing. Interestingly, Google was adding authorship to our webinar archive pages. Even though the pages were marked up for video, Google INFERRED authorship from one line in the body copy that read "presented by XXX" (where XXX was a person's name). Ironically, authorship rich snippets appeared to trump the video thumnail snippet. Grrrr. So we removed the "presented by" and altered the wording, and voila... video thumbnail appears and authorship is removed. Personally, I'd rather see a video thumbnail than the authorship on a video. Perhaps that's just me. But it did prove to me the importance Google may be placing on authorship -- that it even will trump other schema markup for content. I still may write the article with the screen shots and all. :-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Janet Driscoll Mille</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20120906347/Latest/screwed-your-authorship-mark-up-googles-got-you-covered.html#comment-1525</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
