<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Breaking Down Two Big SEO Myths</title>
		<description>Discuss Breaking Down Two Big SEO Myths</description>
		<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20121118371/General-SEO/breaking-down-two-big-seo-myths.html</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:51:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://searchnewscentral.com/feed/com_content/371/Page-1.html" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Anthony Verre says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20121118371/General-SEO/breaking-down-two-big-seo-myths.html#comment-1632</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Couldn't agree with you more Terry. I wish I could answer that question: "why do so many not understand that basic tenant of SEO!" Perhaps, it's just about making SEO more than it really is; the entire "inbound marketing" thing. And, in my opinion is another TRANSPARENCY coup, "re-branding" the profession so the stink comes off. Or perhaps, it's a way to make what we do more palatable to agencies, brands, etc. In the end, it is a blatant attempt, to take the "mineness" away and make it a "they" instrument. (How's that for Existential SEO) Just another faceless marketing tool in the sea of digital marketing.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Anthony Verre</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 16:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20121118371/General-SEO/breaking-down-two-big-seo-myths.html#comment-1632</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Terry Van Horne says:</title>
			<link>http://searchnewscentral.com/20121118371/General-SEO/breaking-down-two-big-seo-myths.html#comment-1631</link>
			<description><![CDATA["I’m as guilty as everyone else. However, I’d like to remind you that social shares are fractional inbound links. A social share is not the same as a true inbound link. Period end of story." You would think that SEO's should know... for the most part shares and likes are unknown because they are behind the wall...Google only knows about what is being shared/liked on G+.if that... for fck sakes folks the rest is not even indexeable!LOOK at the ROBOTS.TXT! That is SEO 101...is it indexable? NO! IT HAS NO VALUE IF THEY DON'T KNOW ABOUT IT...why do so many not understand that basic tenant of SEO!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Terry Van Horne</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 14:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://searchnewscentral.com/20121118371/General-SEO/breaking-down-two-big-seo-myths.html#comment-1631</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
